Doctrinal Position
God eternally exists as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man, and salvation is found in his life, death, and resurrection. Scripture is authoritative for Christian faith and belief.
God eternally exists as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man, and salvation is found in his life, death, and resurrection. Scripture is authoritative for Christian faith and belief.
The aim of this website is to help you select songs that are suitable for congregational church worship, highly biblically accurate, and singable for the average person (1 Corinthians 14:15, Colossians 3:16). It gives you a quick snapshot into how useful a song might be for your church. Ultimately, the hope is that this inspires curiosity beyond what is merely familiar or current and enable you to find songs that will better serve your congregation.
Song suitability scores are best understood as a guide to how often a song is likely to be helpful in corporate worship, not a verdict on overall worth. A slightly higher score shouldn't be taken to mean that one song is inherently or definitively better than another, but that it may be more regularly suitable for congregational use. Low suitability means a song may be less viable for regular congregational worship, more dependent on a specific theme, or best used in another context, such as personal devotion. A very low score often indicates moderate or severe theological issues, or inaccessible singability. On the homepage, there's a button in the top right to 'Show Score Breakdown', which will help in understanding how the suitability score was reached.
A full score doesn't mean a song is flawless or beyond critique. It means the song scored maximally across the categories currently included in the ranking. It's a strong signal but not a certificate of perfection.
This is not an exhaustive list of songs; rather, it includes high-quality options identified through extensive research, as well as widely-used songs (according to CCLI) for the purpose of critiquing.
It must be made abundantly clear that this is not trying to find a 'perfect' song, but to give an honest picture of where a song is strong and where it may fall short, so that you can make an informed decision for your own context. Few songs will score highly in every category, and that's expected rather than a failing of the song or the system. The Psalms don't each try to do everything - a psalm of lament serves a different purpose to a psalm of praise, and neither is lesser. A song can be genuinely valuable without excelling everywhere.
There's an option in the bottom left of the homepage to adjust the weighting of the following categories. Please update this to suit your values and the context of your church.
Simply: are the lyrics theologically accurate? (Acts 17:11, Titus 1:9)
Diligence and discernment are still encouraged. Review any lyrics that have been flagged.
Many well-known worship leaders have incredible vocal ranges but this can leave a congregation behind - particularly in smaller churches - as high notes become unmanageable.
The accepted 'comfortable singing range' is C3 > C4 (middle C to high C). The recommended keys cover a slightly broader range: ~Bb2 > D4. Anything above that D4 and you may find that many people drop out or have to adjust octaves (or try to harmonize) - in other words, you may distract or possibly completely lose the congregation during what is often a key moment of a song.
In large churches with louder music, you may find that you can extend the highest note by an extra tone/step without compromising singability for your congregation. However, anything above an E4 (or possibly F4) will generally be unsingable for most people, regardless of context.
It can also depend on the 'tessitura' (the "comfortable middle") of a song. If a song spends a long time around C4/D4, it will be fatiguing for many people even though it's within that Bb2 > D4 range.
Songs that emphasize corporate worship score higher than those focused primarily on individual expression. As with the Psalms, both communal and personal songs have their place.
This takes into account the relatability (or 'congregational accessibility') of the lyrics: can everyone in the room genuinely sing what the song expresses?
Songs rooted heavily in personal experience may alienate those who haven't shared that experience. This doesn't make the lyrics incorrect, but it may limit how useful and applicable they are in a corporate setting, as it could raise questions about what they refer to (Philippians 2:4, 1 Corinthians 14:15-17).
In contrast, songs that express shared realities - such as salvation, or trusting in Christ - are applicable to all, and easier for the gathered church to sing with integrity.
Grammatical perspective ("I" vs "we") is also considered, but is not a decisive factor in concluding that a song is personal, rather than congregational.
Songs score lower if the object of worship isn't clearly the God of the Bible (Hebrews 13:15, 1 Corinthians 14:8). A useful check is the "Oprah" test: if every reference to God could be replaced with "Oprah" and the lyrics would still make sense, the song probably lacks specificity, and could be sung about anyone.
A low score doesn't mean a song is insincere or theologically wrong. Some much-loved worship songs score low here simply because their language of devotion happens to be transferable. Where a song is genuinely borderline, the score leans toward a fail, as this category has a very high threshold for passing. The test is meant to catch language that only sounds specific to God because we already know who it's addressed to. Naming "Jesus" or "God" isn't enough on its own. A song can use God's name throughout while every surrounding line describes something a devoted friend could just as easily be credited with - being present, carrying you through hard times, loving you unconditionally. Real specificity comes from content only God could be the subject of: an act, attribute, or claim that couldn't apply to a person.
This is different from accuracy, which asks whether what a song says about God is theologically correct. Specificity asks whether it's clear God is who's being addressed at all. A song can be accurate but unspecific (correct claims that could apply to anyone), or specific but inaccurate (clearly about God, but wrong about Him).
As usual, if you don't find this category useful, you can reduce the weighting to suit your values and the context of your church.
Inspired by 'Worship Matters' by Bob Kauflin (page 101).
Many songs contain both perspectives. 'Subjective' songs aren't bad, but songs grounded in objective truth must take precedence.
Kauflin includes a third category ('Reflective'), which is included as part of 'Subjective' in this case.
Songs that place God at the centre of our worship score higher than those primarily focused on us (Psalm 115:1). This is not to invalidate our experiences or emotions, but to prioritize focus on God.
(Hebrews 5:14, Colossians 3:16)
Initially, this was weighted as Secondary, but depth was felt to describe a song's character more than its suitability for congregational worship. A simple song isn't necessarily less suitable, but a different kind of song for a different moment. The option to adjust the weighting is still available, and the song list can be narrowed by the 'Depth' filter for anyone searching by depth specifically.
This category can be more difficult to assess, and some songs will naturally fall near the borderline. A 'Light' rating doesn't mean that a song is invalid - it will still proclaim Biblical truths but will be lighter on Scripture compared with other songs.
Something else to consider is that, while corporate singing is a vital part of our worship to God and something commanded and illustrated throughout Scripture, some people don't engage with sung worship as deeply as others. While, as musicians, that can be easy to forget and hard to understand, songs that are saturated in Scripture can help serve diverse congregations by providing powerful words for worship, rather than turning some people off by relying on melody or repetition.
Songs with minimal repetition score higher. Repetition isn't inherently negative (see Psalm 136), which is why it's given a lighter weighting rather. But some people/churches are sensitive to it and often find excessive repetition distracting and unhelpful, so the option is there to adjust accordingly.
It's worth noting that any repetition in Scripture is surrounded by deep truths, not simple phrases constantly repeated.
Whilst any song can contain lines that are repeated a lot through the choice of the worship leader, songs that rely heavily on repetitive phrases score lower.
Here are some external resources that can help you evaluate songs more deeply:
The Berean Test is an excellent resource for going scripturally deeper into songs.